Sunday 8 May 2011

Breakfast At Tiffany's (1961)

Audrey Hepburn plays Holly Golightly, the craziest heroine who ever crept between the pages of a best-selling novel!

Breakfast at Tiffany's, based on the novella (1958) by Truman Capote, is a romantic comedy drama with a very dark heart about identity, self-delusion and ambition in New York City, featuring a mesmerising central performance by Audrey Hepburn.

Holly Golightly (Hepburn) is a bubbly kooky glamorous fun-loving girl whose life seems to be constant swirl of nightclubs, late night parties and men. A handsome young author, Paul Varjak (George Peppard), moves into an apartment above, and is willingly drawn into the carousel of Holly's chaotic existence.

The stage is set for romance, or would be but for one small hurdle. Varjak has long-term writer's block and seems to subsist on handouts from a wealthy patroness, Emily Eustace Failenson (Patricia Neal), while Holly has set her sights on marrying a man rich enough to validate her current life-style, a millionaire, and puts a kind of magic ring-fence around Varjak, nicknaming him "Fred" after her older brother.

The two leads are likeable characters, and we wish them well. Will the fixedness of Holly's ambitions prevent her from finding true happiness? Will Varjak ever find sufficient lead for his pencil (actually ribbon for his typewriter)? As the story unfolds, the happy-go-lucky world of Holly Golightly begins to develop serious fault-lines, as the world-conquering self-image that she has created for herself becomes increasingly difficult to maintain against the intrusion of inconvenient prosaic realities from her present and past lives.

There are strong parallels between the two lead characters, relating to their sources of income, indicated early on in the story. In the small hours in the apartment building one night, escaping from an insistent drunken date, angry that the $50 "restroom attendant tip" he gave her has got him nothing in return, Holly slips up the fire escape to Varjak's window and sees Failenson inside, adjusting her clothes and leaving a $300 gift on the bedside table before exiting. Holly's main income, it can be inferred, is in the form of "gifts", money or otherwise, from men at clubs, where she presumably serves as some sort of escort or companion. Wikipedia's entry for Capote's novella states: "Holly Golightly (age 18-19) is a country girl turned New York café society girl, who makes her living as a companion to society's most prominent men." Varjak has had a book of short stories published, but nothing else recently, so it seems very doubtful that he could be getting sufficient royalties to pay for an apartment in Manhattan. Judging by the decor, it seems more likely that the apartment is provided for him by Failenson.

While watching, I suspected that Holly Golightly was a stand-in for Truman Capote himself, casting himself, metaphorically as an aspirational "media whore". Wikipedia, however, draws parallels between Golightly and Capote's mother, who carved out a new life for herself in New York City in a similar way to Golightly: "both left the husbands they married as teenagers and abandoned relatives they loved and were responsible for in order to make their way to New York City, and both achieved Cafe Society status through relationships with wealthier men".

The best thing about the film is the character of Holly Golightly, the glamorous tart rejecting her heart, and Hepburn's wonderful portrayal of her. Wikipedia says that Hepburn herself "regarded it as one of her most challenging roles, since she was an introvert required to play an extrovert", and also that Marilyn Monroe was first choice for the role, which would have been different, but also probably very effective. The great song "Moon River" by Henry Mancini was apparently written specially for the "limited vocal range" of Audrey Hepburn, whose singing of it, according to Wikipedia "helped composer Henry Mancini and lyricist Johnny Mercer win an Oscar for Best Song."

Peppard, by contrast, 33 years old at the time, was surely too old for the role. (Hepburn was 42 32, but always looked young for her age.) Admittedly, he does have the intelligence and sensitivity for the role, but to attract a rich sugar mummy, surely his character would need to be a slimmer, more handsome, more waifish younger man, a young Warren Beatty or Anthony Perkins, for instance, not this stolid buttoned-up suit-wearing type.

Sources:


  • Director: Blake Edwards
  • Writers: George Axelrod (screenplay), Truman Capote (novella)
  • Starring: Audrey Hepburn, George Peppard, Martin Balsam, Patricia Neal, Buddy Ebsen, Mickey Rooney, John McGiver, José Luis de Villalonga

Posted using Blogo from my MacBook Pro

Amendments: Following good comment from @anonymous, deleted "more waifish" from description of the young Warren Beatty. Added ranking image. Following comment by Wanderer, struck through the whole of last paragraph, which has been pretty much blown out of the water.



6 comments:

  1. A "waifish" young man like a 1960's Warren Beatty, meaning this -> http://img714.imageshack.us/img714/8120/warren2bbeatty.jpg ?

    ReplyDelete
  2. @Anonymous
    Your point is well made. Beatty is certainly not waifish in that photo, or in any others I could find.

    I was trying for young good-looking male actors of the right age. I did manage to find photos of him as a young lover of older women, though, in the 1961 film "The Roman Spring of Mrs Stone":

    http://www.altfg.com/Stars/photo-actors-v/vivien-leigh-warren-beatty-the-roman-spring-of-mrs-stone.jpg
    http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_9f-5QLXa7_Y/S3LrUyw9A9I/AAAAAAAAERE/91dFlOsVg10/s400/Blog+Art+-+The+Roman+Spring+of+Mrs.+Stone.jpg
    http://acertaincinema.com/workspace/media/optimized-beatty-leigh-roman.jpg

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi. In the movie itself, Emily Eustace Failenson remarks to Paul that she has decorated Paul's apartment.

    Second, your instinct about Holly being written after Truman Capote himself are, at least, partially correct. In this, Capote's biographer Gerald Clarke would agree with you - although he is citing the novella and not the film. Also, the wikipedia article has been updated to mention the fact that Capote wrote a lot of himself into Holly.

    ReplyDelete
  4. @Anonymous
    Thanks for your comment. Yes, you're right, Emily Eustace Failenson does say she decorated the apartment. I guess I suspected that she'd probably gone further than that and essentially paid to furnish the apartment too.
    And thanks for the partial confirmation of Capote writing a lot of himself into Holly. Cheers!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Replies
    1. Thank you, Wanderer. You are right: I was 10 years out: Hepburn was born in 1929 and the film came out in 1961. That kind of defeats any age difference argument about Hepburn and her co-star, Peppard, putting them only a year apart (he was born in 1928),

      Delete